PRP Therapy for acne scars

We are often asked, “Can you help with acne scars?” For many the answer is yes. We have seen many patients over the years with various acne scars who have benefitted from our PRP treatments. What are our PRP treatments and how do they work? (more…)

Treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tears with bone marrow concentrate and whole bone marrow injections

The Darrow Stem Cell Institute has published new research on the treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tears with bone marrow derived stem cells.The research appears in the peer-reviewed journal Cogent Medicine. The study can be found here in its entirety: Treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tears with bone marrow concentrate and whole bone marrow injections with a June 20, 2019 publication date.

Treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tears with bone marrow concentrate and whole bone marrow injections
Marc Darrow, Brent Shaw, Nicholas Schmidt, Gabrielle Boeger & Saskia Budgett | Udo Schumacher (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1628883 | Received 02 Jan 2019, Accepted 30 May 2019, Accepted author version posted online: 18 Jun 2019, Published online: 20 Jun 2019

Below is a summary of our findings:

Background: Human bone marrow has shown promise as a minimally invasive approach in treating a variety of musculoskeletal conditions due to the presence of stem cells, platelets, and growth factors in solution. This study examines the clinical effect of whole bone marrow (WBM) and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) injections in patients who were diagnosed with rotator cuff tears or shoulder osteoarthritis.

  • Forty-seven patients and fifty shoulders (Three patients had both shoulders treated) with rotator cuff tears or shoulder osteoarthritis underwent one or two BMC or WBM treatments.
  • The patients who were injected twice received the injections approximately 22 days apart.
  • We measured outcomes for resting pain, active pain, upper extremity functionality scale and overall improvement percentage. The outcomes were compared to baseline in both groups.


  • Patients who received either one and two treatments reported significant improvements in resting pain, active pain, and functionality score when compared to baseline.
  • These groups also experienced a 42.25% and 50.17% overall improvement respectively.
  • The group that received two treatments experienced statistically significant improvements in active pain when compared to the group that received one injection.
  • There were no significant outcome differences between rotator cuff tear and osteoarthritis patients.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that patients diagnosed with shoulder osteoarthritis or rotator cuff tears experienced symptomatic improvements in pain and functionality when injected with bone marrow concentrate (BMC) or whole bone marrow (WBM) . Further randomized control studies are needed to validate these findings.

Explanations of research:

  • This study was performed to identify the effectiveness of one or two treatments of bone marrow concentrate injections (bone marrow is extracted from your iliac crest, the bone marrow is “spun” to concentrate the growth factors) and whole bone marrow (bone marrow is extracted from your iliac crest, the bone marrow is not concentrated)
  • In many patients we see, one or two treatments will provide significant improvement, as we have documented. For other patients, the severity of their condition would require more treatment and significant results would be achieved with more than 2 treatments. This is discussed with patients at the initial consultation, examination, and assessment of a treatment plan.
  • When a patient at our clinic is recommended to multiple treatments, we advise them to receive injections approximately fourteen days apart. However scheduling conflicts often cause greater injection intervals. The reasoning behind this fourteen-day interval is that this is the time period when there is growth factor secretion from various cell types that participate in the late phases of wound healing .
  • In addition, patients were instructed not to perform any strenuous exercise, and instructed to perform a series of shoulder stretches each day to improve joint mobility and reduce the possibility of adhesive capsulitis.

Patient results of note:

The outcomes of interest for this study were changes to pain (resting and active), overall improvement (percentage scale), and a joint function questionnaire. Data were collected at baseline, preceding each treatment, at 1 month, at 3 months, at 6 months, and annually after treatment. The functionality portion of the questionnaire, assessed degree of difficulty in performing daily activities, was based on 10 of 20 activities assessed in the Upper Extremity Functional Index, These included such activities as:

  1. The difficulty or ability to open a door
  2. The difficulty or ability to wash dishes
  3. The difficulty or ability to comb or brush hair
  4. The difficulty or ability to raise your hand above your head
  5. The difficulty or ability to carry a heavy object
  6. The difficulty or ability to roll over in bed
  7. The difficulty or ability to do a job or household chores
  8. The difficulty or ability to put on or take off a shirt
  9. The difficulty or ability to wash dishes
  10. The difficulty or ability to perform sports or hobbies.

Both Groups 1 and 2 showed statistical significance in terms of pain and functionality when compared to baseline.

  • The single treatment group decreased in resting pain of 33.33% and a 28.13% decrease in active pain. These patients also experienced a mean 42.25% total overall improvement and a 15.81% increase in functionality score.
  • The two treatment group experienced a 47.31% decrease in resting pain and 42.92% decrease in active pain. These patients also experienced a 50.17% total overall improvement and a 36.89% increase in functionality score Patients in group 2 experienced substantial improvement in active pain when compared to patients who only received one injection.

Ask Dr. Darrow about your shoulder pain

A leading provider of stem cell therapy, platelet rich plasma and prolotherapy

PHONE: (800) 300-9300

Research on Platelet Rich Plasma injections for wrinkles and photo-damaged skin

In  recent years doctors have found that by utilizing the growth factors found in the blood (specifically the platelets), a physician can activate stem cells already in the skin to grow new, younger-appearing skin.


  • PRP injections can increase youthful skin thickness and elasticity
  • PRP injections can reduce yellowish skin appearance
  • PRP injections can lessen appearance of wrinkles

There has been a lot of research suggesting how PRP works on damaged skin and wrinkles. A September 2017 study in the Aesthetic surgery journal found that after an injection of PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma, see video below), doctors observed an increase of reticular dermis thickness (the lower of the two layers of the dermis (skin)). This thickening of the skin was due to deposition of elastic fibers (the stuff of skin elasticity) and collagen, with a fibrotic aspect (skin regeneration). (1)

A June 2017 study found that Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) induced a reduction in the manifestations of skin aging, including an improvement in wrinkles and elastosis (yellowish skin). In this research, doctors found that PRP provides growth factors that stimulate fibroblast activation (cells that start collagen production) and induce the synthesis of collagen and other components of the extracellular matrix. (The extracellular matrix is scaffold that collagen builds itself on.)  The study focused on 18 women average age 49 years old. The studies findings include:

  • PRP increased the number of fibroblasts,
  • PRP increased blood vessels in the skin
  • PRP increased collagen density in the skin
  • PRP produced significant improvements in wrinkle and elastosis and photoaging scoring scales. (2)

Published in the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, Egyptian physicians say that your own blood platelets can make your face look younger by attacking your wrinkles.

  • In this study 20 patients with different types of facial wrinkles were tested. All subjects received a single PRP intradermal injection and were clinically assessed before and after treatment for a period of 8 weeks using various testing scores including the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS).
  • The most significant results were with younger subjects that have mild and moderate wrinkles of the nasolabial folds.
  • Side effects of PRP treatment were minimal to mild and with excellent tolerability.
  • CONCLUSION: “Single PRP intradermal injection is well tolerated and capable of rejuvenating the face and producing a significant correction of wrinkles especially the NLFs.” (3)

At Cairo University, also publishing in Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, doctors found that PRP injections yielded significant improvement regarding skin turgor (appearance of plumpness from hydration) and overall vitality. For patients showed positive results for epidermal and dermal thickness.(4)

In Italy, doctors found Platelet Rich Plasma to be an emerging treatment in dermatology for skin rejuvenation. In their study twelve patients underwent 3 sessions of PRP injection at 1-month intervals. Clinical and patient evaluation showed improvement of skin texture. Skin gross elasticity, skin smoothness parameters, skin barrier function, and capacitance were significantly improved.(5)

Do you have a question?

1 Charles-de-Sá L, Gontijo-de-Amorim NF, Takiya CM, Borojevic R, Benati D, Bernardi P, Sbarbati A, Rigotti G. Effect of Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Skin with Intrinsic Aging Process. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2017 Sep 7.

2 Cabrera-Ramírez JO, Puebla-Mora AG, González-Ojeda A, García-Martínez D, Cortés-Lares JA, Márquez-Valdés AR, Contreras-Hernández GI, Bracamontes-Blanco J, Ortiz JS, Fuentes-Orozco C. Plasma rico en plaquetas en el tratamiento del fotodaño cutáneo en las manos. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas. 2017 Jun 16.

3 Elnehrawy NY, Ibrahim ZA, Eltoukhy AM, Nagy HM. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of single platelet-rich plasma injection on different types and grades of facial wrinkles. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Mar;16(1):103-111. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12258. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

4 Gawdat HI, Tawdy AM, Hegazy RA, Zakaria MM, Allam RS. Autologous platelet-rich plasma versus readymade  growth factors in skin rejuvenation: A split face study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Apr 5.

5. Cameli N, Mariano M, Cordone I, Abril E, Masi S, Foddai ML. Autologous Pure Platelet-Rich Plasma Dermal Injections for Facial Skin Rejuvenation: Clinical, Instrumental, and Flow Cytometry Assessment. Dermatol Surg. 2017 Apr 3.

The challenges of low back pain and a diagnosis of sacroiliac joint dysfunction

Marc Darrow MD, JD. Thank you for reading my article. You can ask me your questions about this article using the contact form below.

Patients will often come into our office with an MRI, low back pain and a diagnosis of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. They are in our office because they may have been told that they should consider a surgical recommendation. For many of these people, the MRI was the confirmation that their surgeon needed to go ahead with the surgical recommendation. This may have been the same doctor who had taken them through a course of conservative treatments. These treatments may have included long bouts with anti-inflammatory medications, back braces, physical therapy, and cortisone injections.

All of these treatments did not help them.  Why? A recent study in the Clinical Spine Journal (1) offers the suggestion that sacroiliac joint dysfunction patients do not get treatment relief because they do not have sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Look at what the doctors of this study reported: Confusion

A person goes to the doctor for pain in the pelvic / lower back region.

The currently reported incidence of primary sacroiliac joint ranges from 15% to 30%. (In other words 15% to 30% will get a diagnosis of sacroiliac joint dysfunction.)
When they do not get a diagnosis of sacroiliac joint dysfunction, they may get a diagnosis of:

  • pain generated from the lumbar spine,
  • sacroiliac joint dysfunction, (but not as the primary cause of their pain and therefore not the primary target)
  • and the hip joint.

When these researchers re-examined these patients, with the goal of proving or disproving sacroiliac joint as the primary cause, what they found after a complete diagnostic workup was:

  • 112 (90%) had lumbar spine pain,
  • 5 (4%) had hip pain,
  • 4 (3%) had primary sacroiliac joint dysfunction pain, and
  • 3 (3%) had an undetermined source of pain upon initial diagnosis.

Patients did not have sacroiliac joint dysfunction and in fact the sacroiliac joint is a rare pain generator (3%-6%) in patients complaining of more than 50% sacroiliac joint region related pain. Pain in the sacroiliac joint area is commonly a referral pain from the lumbar spine (88%-90%).

This is why treatments including the use of cortisone will not work in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. The wrong area is getting treated OR the right areas are not getting treated. The right areas may include:

  • The axial low back,
  • buttock/leg region
  • groin/anterior thigh region

Nerve blocks do not work for some patients with sacroiliac joint pain. The reason? The patient does not have primary sacroiliac joint dysfunction

I will often receive an email that will describe to me cortisone injections or nerve blocks that did not help the e-mailer with their low back pain. As we have seen in many patients, the hip-spine-sacroiliac joint complex is a challenging one to differentiate where the pain is coming from. Injections into the hip may not provide relief if the pain is in the sacroiliac joint region. Injections into the sacroiliac joint region may not work if the pain is from the hip or groin.

A study in the medical journal Pain Physician looked at various treatment recommendations for patients suffering from sacroiliac joint pain. These treatments incldued burning the nrves, freezing the nerves, applying cortisone and Botox.

The researchers found the following:

  • “The evidence for cooled radiofrequency neurotomy (freezing the nerve) in managing sacroiliac joint pain is fair.
  • The evidence for effectiveness of intraarticular steroid injections is poor.
  • The evidence for periarticular injections of local anesthetic and steroid or botulinum (Botox) toxin is poor.
  • The evidence for effectiveness of conventional radiofrequency neurotomy (burning the nerves) is poor.
  • The evidence for pulsed radiofrequency is poor.” (2)

Why did they find so many poor results? The chances are the patient did not have sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Let’s look at another study. This time from June 2017 in the journal Medicine.(3) In this research, doctors from Korea investigated the degree of pain reduction following intra-articular pulsed radiofrequency stimulation of the sacroiliac joint in patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain that had not responded to corticosteroid injection.

These research too found disappointing results:

  • Intra-articular pulsed radiofrequency stimulation of the sacroiliac joint was not successful in most patients (80% of all patients). Based on our results, we cannot recommend this procedure to patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain that was unresponsive to corticosteroid injection. 

Here is where treatments that are not helping the sacroiliac joint can become dangerous. How so? Because they will lead to a surgery that will not work either.

Neurosurgeons suggest that treatment for sacroiliac joint pain should not include spinal fusion.

This is the title of a paper published in the journal Neurosurgery clinics of North America : “Sacroiliac Fusion: Another “Magic Bullet” Destined for Disrepute.” (4)

This is what the paper says:

“Pain related to joint dysfunction can be treated with joint fusion; this is a long-standing principle of musculoskeletal surgery. However, pain arising from the sacroiliac  joint is difficult to diagnose. . . Evidence establishing (successful) outcomes (of spinal fusion) is misleading because of vague diagnostic criteria, flawed methodology, bias, and limited follow-up. Because of nonstandardized indications and historically inferior reconstruction techniques, SI joint fusion should be considered unproven. The indications and procedure in their present form are unlikely to stand up to close scrutiny or weather the test of time.”

The challenge of sacroiliac joint dysfunction may be a ligament problem.

Doctors at the Mayo Clinic have published a paper entitled: Comparative role of disc degeneration and ligament failure on functional mechanics of the lumbar spine. In this paper the Mayo Clinic researchers wanted to make a clear definition between two problems affecting low back pain patients.

  • First, that pain could be coming from the discs.
  • Second that pain could be coming from the spinal ligaments.

The Mayo researchers suggest that recognizing how the spine moves is essential for distinguishing between the many different types of spinal disorders, and a diagnosis which may ultimately, and erroneously lead to back surgery.

  • If a patient has instability, excessive movement, and decreased stiffness, doctors should examine for ligament damage.
  • If the opposite, less movement, more stiffness, the doctor should look for disc disease.(3)

This information can help determine the true cause of a patient’s sacroiliac joint dysfunction. When nothing is working, look at the ligaments. How do you look at the ligaments? Through physical examination.

A diagnosis which may ultimately, and erroneously lead to back surgery.

In our own published peer-review research appearing in the July 2018 in the Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR), July 2018, (5) we examined treating spinal ligaments with low back pain. Below is an explanatory adaption of the introductory paragraph of that study. It gives a good understanding of the importance of understanding that we should be looking at the ligament problems in back pain.

    • An Orthopaedic Knowledge Update from the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons tells its surgeon members that muscle strains, ligament sprains, and muscle contusions account for up to 97% of low back pain  in the adult population (6)
    • Additionally, researchers wrote in the Spine Journal that spinal ligaments are often neglected compared to other pathology that account for LBP (7). This could be due to the overreliance of MRIs to guide physicians to correct diagnoses. They write: The influence of the posterior pelvic ring ligaments on pelvic stability is poorly understood. Low back pain and sacroiliac joint pain are described being related to these ligaments.When these ligaments are damaged or weakened, they serve as generators of low back pain.

Are spinal ligament problems the cause of your sacroiliac joint pain? 

Ask Dr. Darrow about your sacroiliac joint pain

A leading provider of stem cell therapy, platelet rich plasma and prolotherapy

PHONE: (800) 300-9300

1 DePhillipo NN, Corenman DS, Strauch EL, Zalepa LK. Sacroiliac Pain: Structural Causes of Pain Referring to the SI Joint Region. Clinical spine surgery. 2018 Oct.
2 Hansen H, Manchikanti L, Simopoulos TT, et al. A systematic evaluation of the therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Pain Physician. 2012 May;15(3):E247-78.
3 Chang MC, Ahn SH. The effect of intra-articular stimulation by pulsed radiofrequency on chronic sacroiliac joint pain refractory to intra-articular corticosteroid injection: A retrospective study. Medicine. 2017 Jun;96(26).
4 Bina RW, Hurlbert RJ. Sacroiliac Fusion: Another “Magic Bullet” Destined for Disrepute. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 2017 Jul 31;28(3):313-20.
5 Marc Darrow, Brent Shaw BS. Treatment of Lower Back Pain with Bone Marrow Concentrate. Biomed J Sci&Tech Res 7(2)-2018. BJSTR. MS.ID.001461. DOI: 10.26717/ BJSTR.2018.07.001461. 5/
An HS, Jenis LG, Vaccaro AR (1999) Adult spine trauma. In Beaty JH (Eds.). Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 6. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons pp. 653-671



Update on: Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Therapy

Marc Darrow MD, JD. Thank you for reading my article. You can ask me your questions  using the contact form below. 

The material in the injections that we use for our umbilical cord blood stem cell therapy comes from full-term live birth deliveries in a hospital setting. These materials are the umbilical cord blood from the discarded placenta, and of course, the umbilical cord itself.

The umbilical cord materials do not come from an aborted fetus nor are they taken from the baby. These materials are donated by the birth mother to the hospital for continuing medical research and for the development of medical products to help others. No baby is harmed.

There is controversy in the medical community about umbilical cord blood stem cells. Some insist that the injectable solution contains abundant live umbilical cord blood stem cells. Some suggest that the stem cells are not alive. I have seen the flow cytometry showing live stem cells. The research shows that these stem cells release cytokines and growth factors that awaken native stem cells.

I have tried this treatment on myself for both shoulders and knees. After great success, I started using this treatment on patients. I still use PRP and bone marrow depending on the patient’s pathology and requirements. To date the results are excellent for all of these treatments. We are in the process of doing a study on cord blood stem cells (we have done others on bone marrow and PRP) to see which treatments are the most successful. We are awaiting more long term results.

Stem cells: the most remarkable development

I have tried this treatment on myself, and, on numerous occasions. 

Throughout this website you read about our clinical observations surrounding the use of bone marrow derived stem cells in the treatment of degenerative joint, tendon, ligament, and spine disease. In late 2018, after much research, I decided to add new products to our treatment line. Part of my decision was based on research like this, published in October 2018 in the journal Regenerative Medicine. (1)

“Stem cell-based therapy for the treatment of orthopedic diseases is arguably one of the most remarkable developments in the field of regenerative medicine. A better understanding of Mesenchymal stem cell biology and identification of Mesenchymal stem cells in (umbilical) cord blood have added umbilical cord blood to the sources of stem cells used for treatment of nonhematopoietic diseases.”

In that same study, the researchers noted: “the data conclusively establish that (umbilical cord blood) is enriched in cytokines (proteins that communicate commands to stem cells) and growth factors that play an important role in bone regeneration and repair.”

Bone regeneration and repair is certainly an appealing treatment for degenerative joint disease. Later in this article we will look at the research surrounding the impact of growth factors and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells not only for bone repair, but cartilage repair as well.

“A painless collection procedure”

“The human umbilical cord is a promising source of mesenchymal stem cells. Unlike bone marrow stem cells, human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells have a painless collection procedure.”(2)

That’s what researchers wrote as the introduction to their paper, “Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: a new era for stem cell therapy.” The paper appeared in the medical journal Cell Transplantation. While bone marrow stem cell therapy has shown itself to be an effective and reliable treatment for musculoskeletal injury, a concern our patients had with the treatment surrounded the discomfort of the bone marrow stem cell harvest. The harvesting of bone marrow stem cells requires an aspiration of the bone marrow from the bone of the iliac crest of the pelvis. In other words, we drill into the pelvis. We numb the area of the pelvis, use a small drill device, and the marrow is aspirated within a few moments. We have done thousands of these procedures with thousands of happy patients.

However, even though we take great effort to make this procedure as painless as we can, some patients still did not like the process. Some decline a treatment that would be a great benefit to them because they cannot overcome the drilling aspect of the bone marrow treatment.

  • The stem cell procedure with the umbilical stem cells is a much less invasive procedure because there is no drilling. Human umbilical cord stem cell therapy requires no harvesting from the patient. Indeed, umbilical cord stem cell therapy offers “a painless collection procedure.”

Are Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cells Safe?

When we first offered donated umbilical cord stem cell therapy, many patients had questions. Specifically, is this treatment safe? First, these donated cells come to us from a laboratory. The cells are frozen for transit to assure safety.

Are the stem cells screened for infectious disease?

Laboratories that process human umbilical cord stem cells screen and test the donor mother with infectious disease panels.
The screening process is in accordance with and determined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and American Association of Tissue Banks (AATB). We look for laboratories that surpass these governmental screening standards.

Is there a risk of rejection? Is there a risk of cell mutation?

Rejection and risk of the cell’s mutation into cancer cells is a frequent question of concern our patients have. I will refer to the research that show the safety of the treatment.

Donated umbilical cord blood cells easily pass for being “native” to the new host

In the journal, Stem cell reviews and reports, (3) researchers noted that in looking for bone marrow donors for cancer patients and those with other immunodeficient disease, umbilical cord blood may offer a better answer for those waiting donation. Why?

  • “Umbilical cord blood offers advantages over bone marrow because cord blood does not require perfect human leukocyte antigen (HLA) tissue matching, (simply donated umbilical cord blood cells easily passes for being “native” to the new host) has less incidence of graft vs host disease (rejection), and may be used allogenically.”

Used allogenically implies that the stem cells from the umbilical cord blood can mix and intermingle with the bone marrow stem cells of a cancer or immune deficient patient whose own bone marrow had been damaged or destroyed by disease, infection, or chemotherapy. This intermingling comes with little risk of gene mutation or rejection.

This study tested the positive effects of umbilical cord blood stem cells in developing new cartilage. Researchers wrote in the journal BioMed research international (4) that umbilical cord stem cells have numerous advantages over bone marrow donor derived stem cells, including convenient collection, reduced immunogenicity (immune stimulating response), absence of tumor cell contamination, and lower risk of latent virus and pathogenic microorganism transmission.

Research: the most vulnerable patients were not rejecting the umbilical cord stem cells from unrelated and unmatched donors.

The research that umbilical cord stem cells produced growth factors needed to rebuild bone marrow stem cells and that the umbilical cord blood donors could be unrelated or “unmatched,” to the recipient goes back to the early 1990s. Here researchers were looking for answers in helping children with various cancers who needed bone marrow transplants and who were not getting these transplants in time.

After 12 years of using unmatched donor stem cells in pediatric cancer patients, researchers recorded in 2005 in the Journal of Clinical Investigations (5) that “over the 12 years since the first unrelated-donor cord blood transplant was performed at Duke University Medical Center, there have been more than 6,000 unrelated-donor transplants performed in more than 150 locations around the world. In the vast majority of these transplants, HLA mismatching between donor and recipient was present at 1 or 2 HLA antigens.”

In other words, the most vulnerable patients, children with cancer, were not rejecting the umbilical cord stem cells from unrelated and unmatched donors.

In 2009, Joanne Kurtzberg, MD, the lead researcher in this 2005 study, published an update in the journal Current opinion in pediatrics.  (6)

Despite limited enthusiasm in its early days, the field of cord blood transplantation is now firmly established.

Umbilical cord blood from related and unrelated donors, matched or mismatched at one or two antigens, is now widely regarded as an alternate donor source to matched marrow or peripheral blood for allogeneic transplantation in children as well as adults for a variety of malignant and non-malignant disorders.

This use of cord blood dramatically increases access to transplantation therapy for patients lacking matched related or unrelated adult donors.

In one of her concluding statements, Dr. Kurtzberg wrote: “In the future, (umbilical cord blood) may emerge as a source of cells for cellular therapies focused on tissue repair and regeneration.”

More research on safety

I would like to present learning points from researchers at Clemson University published in the Journal of Cell Science & Therapy (7). It reinforces the observations of these earlier studies.

“Next to hematopoeitic stem cells (those found in umbilical cord blood), the most widely studied stem cells in bone marrow are marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, also known as marrow stromal cells. In the adult, mesenchymal stem cells are found in highest concentration in the marrow cavity. Mesenchymal stem cell-like cells can be isolated from umbilical cord blood, placenta, perivascular (surrounding blood vessel) areas, amniotic fluid, and from the tissue surrounding the umbilical cord vessels, i.e., Wharton’s jelly. The collection of Mesenchymal stem cell-like cells from tissues that are discarded at birth is easier and less expensive than collecting Mesenchymal stem cells from a bone marrow aspirate. During the collection of these tissues, there is no health impact on either the mother or the newborn. At least in theory, these cells may be stored frozen and then thawed to provide stem cells for therapeutic use decades after cryogenic storage. . .”

More from this research indicates that:

  • The stem cell material is not considered dangerous to the patient receiving the injection in any way, even if the patient is in no way related to the donor.
  • Fluids and cells from the umbilical cord blood, placenta, and amniotic fluid are immunologically privileged meaning they cause no reaction even between completely unrelated donors and recipients.

Research: “(Treatment) without a major risk of rejection.”

A 2016 study from Korean researchers also demonstrated that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from umbilical cord blood, as well as other tissues, could also suppress the allogeneic response of lymphocytes and serve as a useful source for cell therapies and allogeneic stem cell transplantation between HLA-incompatible recipients. They noted in their research that “…allogeneic MSCs derived from umbilical cord blood can be a useful candidate for allogeneic cell therapy and transplantation without a major risk of rejection.” (8)

Long-term observations on risk and the use of donated umbilical cord blood stem cells: The findings of a 7-year study.

In 2017, doctors reported their findings in the journal Stem cells translational medicine  (9) of a seven-year observation of patients who had received human umbilical cords stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis:

Here are the safety learning points of this research:

  • This study revealed that treatment with an allogeneic human umbilical cord blood stem cells is safe.
  • The results of the study show that the patients had no significant adverse effects or undesired effects over the seven years of follow‐up.
  • None of the study participants had substantial permanent degenerative disease.
  • The study found no evidence of abnormal findings suggesting rejection or infection.
  • The researchers suggest that the characteristics of the human umbilical cord blood stem cells such as hypoimmunogenicity (does not cause an immune system reaction) and immunomodulatory (the immune system does not consider these “foreign” cells to be invaders) activity contributed to the lack of the stem cells rejection.
  • There were no cases of osteogenesis (bone mutation) or tumorigenesis over 7 years.

Here are the learning points regarding the outcome of the patient’s human umbilical cord blood stem cells knee osteoarthritis treatment:

Not only did the doctors report that none of the seven patients in the study needed to undergo knee replacement despite the severity of their degenerative knee disease, but umbilical cord blood stem cells appear to be safe and effective for the regeneration of durable articular cartilage in osteoarthritic knees.

Research on Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Treatment

In the Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, (10) doctors reported on the effects of umbilical cord blood stem cell therapy on their patients. Here are the learning points of their study:

  • Between January 2015 and January 2016, 36 patients with moderate or severe degenerative knee osteoarthritis were randomly divided into 2 groups of 18 patients each.
  • Intra-articular injection of human umbilical cord stem cell suspension was performed once a month for 2 times as a course of treatment in the cell treatment group; sodium hyaluronate by intra-articular injection was used once a week for 5 times as a course of treatment in the control group.
  • All patients of 2 groups received a course of treatment.
  • The patients were followed up for 6 months.
  • In the stem cell treatment group, standardized pain and function scores at 2-6 months after treatment were significantly better when compared with scores before treatment, and no recurrence of knee pain was observed during follow-up.
  • The standardized pain and function scores at 1 and 2 months after treatment between 2 groups were similar but the scores of the cell treatment group were significantly better than those of the control group at 3 and 6 months.

Conclusion: Human umbilical cord stem cells can significantly improve the joint function and quality of life for patients with degenerative knee osteoarthritis. It takes effect after 1 month and the treatment effect can be sustained for 6 months.

A December 2018 study in the medical journal Stem cells translational medicine (11) examined single versus multiple umbilical cord blood stem cell treatments in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis.

The patients in this study either:

  • Received hyaluronic acid injections at the baseline of the study and at 6 months.
  • Received a single-dose umbilical cord blood stem cell treatment at baseline.
  • Received two umbilical cord blood stem cell treatments at baseline and 6 months.
  • Clinical scores and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were assessed throughout the 12 months follow-up.
  • No severe adverse events were reported.
  • Only umbilical cord blood stem cell treatment patients experienced significant pain and function improvements from baseline.
  • Patients reached significantly lower levels of pain in the two umbilical cord blood stem cell treatment group as compared with the hyaluronic acid injection group.
  • Repeated umbilical cord blood stem cell treatment is safe and superior to hyaluronic acid injections in knee osteoarthritis at 1-year follow-up.

How the treatment works: Growth factors and stem cells in umbilical cord blood

In the research cited above, investigators have been able to show that human umbilical cord blood stem cells are safe and effective in treating musculoskeletal disorders. Now let’s delve a little deeper into how these stem cells work and how these stem cells interact with your own stem cells.

Let’s review: Umbilical cord blood contains a great amount of mesenchymal stem cells. Mesenchymal stem cells are part of the tissue building mechanism that makes connective tissue such as cartilage, muscles, bones, and fat pads. As a baby develops in the womb, these mesenchymal stem cells proliferate (grow) and differentiate (change) into creating the musculoskeletal system of the baby.

However, the baby needs more than stem cells. The baby needs growth factors and “cell signalers” that help the stem cells understand what they need to do. While I will explain growth factors and “cell signalers” below, I want to emphasize that it is the growth factors and “cell signalers” in the umbilical cord blood that are critical in making stem cell therapy treatments successful.

I also want to remind the reader that in our use of umbilical cord stem cell therapy, these materials are part of the afterbirth. When the doctor cuts the umbilical cord, the baby no longer has need of this material, the mother can now donate it.

In a study I referenced earlier in the journal BioMed research international, (4) researchers examined the pathway to cartilage repair with umbilical cord blood stem cells. This was not a clinical study, but rather a study to test whether umbilical cord blood stem cells could repair cartilage in a laboratory setting.

What the researchers found was that human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells could be easily induced to differentiate into mature bone and cartilage cells by stimulation with growth factors.

This was supported by research in the journal Molecular medicine reports,(12) which explored the effect of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells on chondrocytes (cartilage building block cells) from patients with osteoarthritis in a laboratory setting. The researchers found human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes have mutual effect on each other that causes the creation and proliferation of new cartilage cells. Therefore, human umbilical cord stem cells could significantly reduce the effects of osteoarthritis.

How the umbilical cord blood growth factors work in degenerative joint and spine disease

In research published in the International wound journal (13) doctors at Stanford University School of Medicine and the Georgia Institute of Technology along with author colleagues at collaborating medical universities, focused on growth factors presented in afterbirth material.

The researchers found these growth factors facilitated normal wound healing functions, including cell proliferation and chemotaxis (cell migration and movement to the site of injury), as well as promoting angiogenesis (blood vessel formation), deposition of Extracellular Matrix (the scaffold where stem cells grow) and regulating inflammation. I am going to explain these processes in greater detail below.

In simple terms, the growth factors found in the placenta/umbilical material:

  • Helped guide stem cells and support cells already in a damaged joint to the sites of degenerative damage.
  • Supported these cells by helping create new blood flow to the damaged areas so healing elements could get there and damaged tissue could be whisked away.
  • Then, the growth factors helped build the scaffolds that spanned the damage that stem cells could adhere to and differentiate into what they needed to become, cartilage, synovial tissue, collagen for ligaments and tendons, etc.

In 2011, doctors at the University of Aberdeen published research in the journal Arthritis and rheumatism that provided the first evidence that resident stem cells in the knee joint synovium underwent proliferation (multiplied) and chondrogenic differentiation (made themselves into cartilage cells) following injury.(14)

This paper, presenting the idea that stem cells in an injured knee increased in numbers in preparation of healing, has been cited by more than 52 medical studies. If the stem cells in your knee synovial lining are abundant and could rebuild cartilage after injury, why isn’t your knee fixing itself? This is where umbilical cord blood stem cell therapy comes in.

One of those 52 medical studies I just mentioned, was performed by researchers at the University of Calgary in 2012. Among their questions, was the same question we just speculated on: “If the stem cells in the knee synovial lining are abundant and have the ability to rebuild cartilage after injury, why isn’t the knee fixing itself?” Here is what they published in the medical journal PLOS ONE.(15)

“Since osteoarthritis leads to a progressive loss of cartilage and synovial progenitors (rebuilding) cells have the potential to contribute to articular cartilage repair, the inability of osteoarthritis synovial fluid Mesenchymal progenitor cells (stem cell growth factors) to spontaneously differentiate into chondrocytes suggests that cell-to-cell aggregation and/or communication may be impaired in osteoarthritis and somehow dampen the normal mechanism of chondrocyte replenishment from the synovium or synovial fluid. Should the cells of the synovium or synovial fluid be a reservoir of stem cells for normal articular cartilage maintenance and repair, these endogenous sources of chondro-biased cells would be a fundamental and new strategy for treating osteoarthritis and cartilage injury if this loss of aggregation and differentiation phenotype can be overcome.”

In common terms, the “reservoir of stem cells for normal articular cartilage maintenance and repair,” already in the knee, are not fixing the knee because of a confused communication. The joint environment has changed from healing to degenerative and made clear communications “murky.” This is attested to in the research by this concluding statement:

“These results reveal a fundamental shift in the chondrogenic ability of cells isolated from arthritic joint fluids, and we speculate that the mechanism behind this change of cell behavior is exposure to the altered milieu of the osteoarthritis joint fluid.”

The paper suggests that getting these stem cells communicating and healing would create a fundamental new strategy in healing. Umbilical cord blood stem cell therapy helps with this problem of communication as demonstrated in the above studies.

This research was supported in a study from December 2017 published in the journal Nature reviews. (16) The paper suggested that recognizing that joint-resident stem cells are comparatively abundant in the joint and occupy multiple niches (from the center of the joint to the outer edges) will enable the optimization of single-stage therapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis.

Growth factors bring blood and healing factors to the degenerative damage

You need blood circulation for healing – growth factors make new blood highways

From my early start in regenerative medicine until now, the role of inflammation in healing and the need to bring circulation to a degenerated joint has not changed. To heal a bad knee, a bad hip, a bad shoulder, to heal anything, you need blood circulation and the healing and growth factors blood brings to the site of injury and degeneration. These are the amazing things blood does:

  • Blood brings healing elements to the site of joint damage
  • Blood takes away diseased tissue from that site.
  • Blood also brings oxygen that helps create an “anti-oxidant” healthy joint environment and takes away the “oxidant” toxic sludge that develops as a byproduct of chronic inflammation in the joint’s synovial tissue.

Above we discussed the role of umbilical cord blood stem cell therapy in changing a diseased joint environment into a healing joint environment.

To get blood to an injury you need new blood vessels

Angiogenesis is the scientific term to describe the process of creating new blood vessels, “Angio” meaning related to blood vessels, “Genesis,” the creation of new blood vessels are formed as new branches of existing blood vessels. One of the growth factors found in human umbilical cord blood is called ANG-1.


ANG-1 is an Angiopoietin. Angiopoietins are protein growth factors in a developing baby that helps with vascular development and the formation of the blood circulatory network. When this growth factor is introduced into a degenerative joint it starts talking to the endothelium tissue cells that line the patient’s blood vessels.

What do they talk about?

It works together with the surrounding cellular matrix (the growth factors already in your body that surround your stem cells) and mesenchyme, the cells of the connective tissue, and your mesenchymal stem cells. ANG-1 also talks to your lymphatic vessels to prepare them for an increased flow of toxins and damaged tissue, that will be coming out of your joint.

Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF)

Another important growth factor found in human umbilical cord blood is called basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). bFGF does many things, but in the context of this chapter, I want to focus on bFGF’s activity during injury repair.

  • bFGF helps with the formation of new blood vessels in conjunction with ANG-1.
  • bFGF lives in the subendothelial extracellular matrix of blood vessels, the growth factor pool of stem cells in the blood vessel lining. Here it helps move oxygen and nutrients to support the cells healing damaged tissue and it helps with the sprouting of new blood vessels during angiogenesis.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)

As its name implies, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) is involved in vascular and blood vessel cell development. VEGF makes blood vessels that helps form new bone and cartilage.

  • Blood flow assists bone and cartilage

Now let’s watch the interplay between these growth factors in the development of new bone and cartilage.

  • Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is involved with the differentiating of mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts, bone cells.
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) makes bone from cartilage cells.
  • In a developing baby, growth plates are soft areas at the end of long bones. The area remains soft through puberty or until the adolescent reaches a state of maturation and growing has stopped.
  • At this point, the soft, flexible cartilage-like growth plate turns into bone. A constant state of blood flow is needed for this new and developing bone. VEGF makes sure it is there.

So now you understand how this works in a baby and a developing adolescent, but, how does this work in the aging population and their challenges of degenerative disease? Researchers at Harvard give this recap in the medical journal Bone: (17)

  • “VEGF is one of the most important growth factors for regulation of vascular development and angiogenesis. Since bone is a highly vascularized organ (abundant blood circulation) and angiogenesis plays an important role in osteogenesis (formation of bone) VEGF also influences skeletal development and postnatal bone repair.
  • Compromised bone repair and regeneration in many patients can be attributed to impaired blood supply; thus, modulation of VEGF levels in bones represents a potential strategy for treating compromised bone repair and improving bone regeneration.
  • Local administration of VEGF may be useful in treatment of impaired bone healing/regeneration as a consequence of age or osteoporosis.” In other words, bring blood to the damaged bone.

You need cellular communication for healing – growth factors make new communication networks that send signals to grow bone

Above, I touched on cell signaling, and that umbilical cord stem cells start conversations with the cells in an already damaged joint.

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in addition to its role as a growth factor, is a signaling protein. Signaling proteins help cells communicate with each other and provide navigational signals. Navigation is obviously an important element in healing, in that healing cells need to know where they are going to in the damaged joint.

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) found in umbilical cord blood is a growth factor of great interest in bone healing. What makes it so interesting is that it stimulates your own stem cells to reboot the healing process. How? By way of communicating with the other cells.

In January 2019 researchers examined the role of growth factors in helping stem cells in a damaged joint get to the point of injury. The study published in the journal Biochemical and biophysical research communications  (18) found that “Endogenous (your own) bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells are mobilized into peripheral blood and injured tissues by various growth factors and cytokines (messenger cells) that are expressed in the injured tissues, such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β).”

Umbilical cord blood growth factors work with your stem cells

In the research above, we see that umbilical cord stem cell growth factors help the damaged healing communication system in degenerative joints reset and restart. In doing so, the healing communications network starts giving commands to the cells to start healing again.

Here is some interesting research from doctors in the United Kingdom published in the November 2017 issue of Future science OA (19). The study from the University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospital discusses native stem cell activity in degenerative knee disease.

The researchers found signs of tissue adaptation and attempted repair responses in osteoarthritis-affected osteochondral (bone and cartilage) tissues. What this means is that even in advanced osteoarthritis, the knee (and the stem cells within it) is trying to heal itself. But it is an attempted repair that never completes. So now the focus shifts to what can doctors do to help the stem cells complete the repair. One answer is more communicating growth factors. Where can you get them? You can get them from umbilical cord blood stem cells.

Are you a candidate for treatment? Ask Dr. Darrow

A leading provider of stem cell therapy, platelet rich plasma and prolotherapy

PHONE: (800) 300-9300


1 Sane MS, Misra N, Mousa OM, Czop S, Tang H, Khoo LT, Jones CD, Mustafi SB. Cytokines in umbilical cord blood-derived cellular product: a mechanistic insight into bone repair. Regenerative medicine. 2018 Oct 22;13(8):881-98.
2 Ding DC, Chang YH, Shyu WC, Lin SZ. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: a new era for stem cell therapy. Cell transplantation. 2015 Mar 31;24(3):339-47.
3 Weiss ML, Troyer DL. Stem cells in the umbilical cord. Stem Cell Rev. 2006;2(2):155-62.
4 Li X, Duan L, Liang Y, Zhu W, Xiong J, Wang D. Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Contribute to Chondrogenesis in Coculture with Chondrocytes. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3827057.
5 Kurtzberg J, Lyerly AD, Sugarman J. Untying the Gordian knot: policies, practices, and ethical issues related to banking of umbilical cord blood. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(10):2592-7.
6 Kurtzberg J. Update on umbilical cord blood transplantation. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;21(1):22-9.
7 Larson, Andrew & Gallicchio, Vincent. (2017). Amniotic Derived Stem Cells: Role and Function in Regenerative Medicine. Journal of Cell Science & Therapy. 08. 10.4172/2157-7013.1000269.
8 Lee HJ, Kang KS, Kang SY, et al. Immunologic properties of differentiated and undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood. J Vet Sci. 2016;17(3):289-97.
9 Park YB, Ha CW, Lee CH, Yoon YC, Park YG. Cartilage Regeneration in Osteoarthritic Patients by a Composite of Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Hyaluronate Hydrogel: Results from a Clinical Trial for Safety and Proof-of-Concept with 7 Years of Extended Follow-Up. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016;6(2):613-621. (1025)
10 Wang Y, Jin W, Liu H, Cui Y, Mao Q, Fei Z, Xiang C. CURATIVE EFFECT OF HUMAN UMBILICAL CORD MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS BY INTRA-ARTICULAR INJECTION FOR DEGENERATIVE KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS. Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi= Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi= Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery. 2016 Dec;30(12):1472-7.
11 Matas J, Orrego M, Amenabar D, Infante C, Tapia‐Limonchi R, Cadiz MI, Alcayaga‐Miranda F, González PL, Muse E, Khoury M, Figueroa FE. Umbilical Cord‐Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) for Knee Osteoarthritis: Repeated MSC Dosing Is Superior to a Single MSC Dose and to Hyaluronic Acid in a Controlled Randomized Phase I/II Trial. Stem cells translational medicine. 2018 Dec 28.
12 Wang H, Yan X, Jiang Y, Wang Z, Li Y, Shao Q. The human umbilical cord stem cells improve the viability of OA degenerated chondrocytes. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(3):4474-4482.
13 Koob TJ, Rennert R, Zabek N, et al. Biological properties of dehydrated human amnion/chorion composite graft: implications for chronic wound healing. Int Wound J. 2013;10(5):493-500.
14 Kurth TB, Dell’accio F, Crouch V, Augello A, Sharpe PT, De Bari C. Functional mesenchymal stem cell niches in adult mouse knee joint synovium in vivo. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 May;63(5):1289-300. doi: 10.1002/art.30234.
15 Krawetz RJ, Wu YE, Martin L, Rattner JB, Matyas JR, Hart DA. Synovial Fluid Progenitors Expressing CD90+ from Normal but Not Osteoarthritic Joints Undergo Chondrogenic Differentiation without Micro-Mass Culture. Kerkis I, ed. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8):e43616. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043616.
16 McGonagle D, Baboolal TG, Jones E. Native joint-resident mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2017 Dec;13(12):719.
17 Hu K, Olsen BR. The roles of vascular endothelial growth factor in bone repair and regeneration. Bone. 2016;91:30-8.
18 Yu J, Kim HM, Kim KP, Son Y, Kim MS, Park KS. Ceramide kinase regulates the migration of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2019 Jan 8;508(2):361-7. / 1169